SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
SLJ Blog Network +
  • 100 Scope Notes
  • A Fuse #8 Production
  • Good Comics for Kids
  • Heavy Medal: A Mock Newbery Blog
  • Teen Librarian Toolbox
  • The Classroom Bookshelf
  • The Yarn
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About/Contact
  • Book Discussion
  • Heavy Medal Mock
  • Process

December 1, 2008 by Sharon McKellar

Hungry for Hunger Games

December 1, 2008 by Sharon McKellar   8 comments

When Nina made a post not too long ago requesting any titles we may have missed we had several people respond with the suggestion of The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins.  I wanted to take a minute to both address my feelings on the book as well as to offer an opportunity to its supporters for Mock Newbery consideration.

Nina and I have both read the book and seem to have similar feelings about it.  It seems as though everyone loved the book and thus wants it to be considered.  But I haven’t yet heard an argument for the book that explains why it might be distinguished and merit potential Newbery discussion.  Loving the book is not enough.  I also loved the book.  I couldn’t put it down and I can’t wait for the sequel.  But I also didn’t find the writing anywhere near as distinguished as the other books we’ve put on the shortlist or as many of the others we’ve been discussing.  Aside from the question of character development, which Nina has brought up, I just wonder if there’s something I am missing.

SCROLL TO KEEP READING THIS POST

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

So I’m hoping that advocates for this book can take a moment or two and explain in the comments WHY you feel this book should be considered for our shortlist.  Not just because it is loved and will be loved by young people, but why is it distinguished.  Not just distinguished – but possible the most distinguished book for children from this publication year.  I’m open to your thoughts, but so far I just am not convinced.

Filed under: Uncategorized

SHARE:

Read or Leave Comments

About Sharon McKellar

Sharon McKellar is the Supervising Librarian for Teen Services at the Oakland Public Library in California. She has served on the Rainbow List Committee, the Notable Children’s Recordings Committee, The Arbuthnot Honor Lecture Committee, and the 2015 Caldecott Committee. You can reach her at sharon@mckellar.org.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

June 2022

Mock Newbery Update - Our List of First Half Suggestions

by Sharon McKellar

January 2022

THE FINAL FIVE: Heavy Medal Mock Newbery 2022 Contenders

by Sharon McKellar

December 2021

Last hours to submit your opinions and applications!

by Sharon McKellar

January 2021

Heavy Medal Mock Newbery Finalist: SHOW ME A SIGN by Ann Clare LeZotte

by Sharon McKellar

January 2021

Heavy Medal Mock Newbery Finalist: PRAIRIE LOTUS by Linda Sue Park

by Sharon McKellar

ADVERTISEMENT

SLJ Blog Network

100 Scope Notes

The Yarn LIVE at ALA 2022!

by Travis Jonker

A Fuse #8 Production

Publisher Preview: Ellen Myrick (Part Three!)

by Betsy Bird

Good Comics for Kids

Review | Red and Rover: Fun’s Never Over

by Mike Pawuk

Heavy Medal

Mock Newbery Update – Our List of First Half Suggestions

by Steven Engelfried

Teen Librarian Toolbox

Book Mail: Dachshunds, monsters, magic, climate change, and more!

by Amanda MacGregor

The Classroom Bookshelf

The Classroom Bookshelf is Moving

by Erika Thulin Dawes

The Yarn

Shark Week, Vanilla Ice Cream, and the Honda CRV: Bob Shea and Brian Won Team Up for ADURABLE

by Travis Jonker

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Articles on SLJ

2021 Youth Media Awards Winners

Children’s Publishing World Reacts to Michaela Goade's History-Making Caldecott Medal, Rest of the YMA Winners

A Grateful Michaela Goade Makes Caldecott History

Ringing in the Newbery (and Caldecott): An awards-trivia smackdown with Betsy Bird and Travis Jonker

Jack Gantos on the Real Norvelt, Propaganda, and Good News | The Newbery at 100

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Wendy says

    December 1, 2008 at 4:13 pm

    I can only talk against it. The best word I can use for this book is “awesome”; it’s stimulating and fascinating in just about every way. I thought at first that the plot might feel derivative, but instead, it just reflects some classic works. BUT–people keep saying how great the plot is, and I have to say… what plot? So much of it is just world-building, and after that, it’s like we’re watching the show ourselves; it’s just a bunch of deaths. As odd as it is to say this about such an exciting book, the plot is pretty flat. There’s basically no change in Katniss. And I think more explorations of the psychological effects on the players would have deepened the book a lot. We get hints of this, so we know it isn’t because Katniss doesn’t care about, say, Rue dying, or killing people herself. (I found Nina’s earlier comments and see that she has the same reaction I do about Katniss never having to be a cold-blooded killer, which is convenient for us, her fans.)

    I also initially had issues with the ending that made me discard it as a potential Newbery immediately–it lacks completeness–but when I reread the last few pages, it didn’t bother me as much as during my initial reading, when I was so focused on “what happens next”.

    It’s such a good book, and I’m glad so many people are reading it, but there are more distinguished books–books that I’d want to recommend to children and say “this is what excellent writing is”. (Not that many in my reading so far this year, though. I might be okay with an Honor here.)

  2. Ben says

    December 2, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    I don’t think it should be considered for any mock Newbery competitions for one simple reason: it’s a book written for teenagers, not for childen (as defined by the award criteria, “persons of ages up to and including age fourteen”). Thus, it would be more suited for a Printz Award, not a Newbery.

  3. Wendy says

    December 2, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    Ben, can you be more specific about what age group you think it’s meant for? I would put it squarely in the 12-14 category, myself. It seems a little old for the Newbery, a little young for the Printz, and I wouldn’t give it to a ten-year-old, but I’m fine with it in the Newbery category. (Though as with After Tupac and D Foster, I’m sure there’d be huge outcry from certain sectors.)

  4. BethS says

    December 2, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    I’m with you actually, I love this book. It’s one of my favorites of the year, but it is not a book to win an award based solely on literary merit. BBYA Top Ten yes, Printz- not likely.

  5. dave r says

    December 2, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    Ben, there have been other books that straddled the fence on which award they should get. Lizzie Bright and the Buckminster Boy and The House of the Scorpion both garnered similar discussions the years they were eligible (and they were honored by both). And I remember Al Capone Does My Shirts getting the same kind of questioning when it was up for awards.

    As to Hunger Games, I don’t know. True, the writing isn’t as beautiful as some of the other books being talked about, but when put in the context of “is the writing distinguished for the purpose of the book?” I’d say yes. The writing is exceptional for the purpose of the book, but the purpose of the book is not literary. I’m just not sure.

  6. ron d. says

    December 8, 2008 at 2:45 pm

    I’m still unclear about what “literary” means. When you create a compelling world, with a riveting plot and characters that readers strongly empathize with, why is that not considered “literary” or “distinguished?” Are we just talking about poetic language and metaphors and that sort of thing then? Is it then impossible for any flat out page turner to win this award?

  7. Amy says

    December 9, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    Okay, so I am blog stupid, but can someone tell me how to find Nina’s comments on Hunger Games? But in response to what was said here: 1. I don’t think the age thing is really an issue. I would tend to think of it for Printz, but I agree with Wendy: it is definitely in the 12-14 age group and thus eligible. 2. I did love this book. I think one of the things that makes it notable is Collins’ incredibly detailed and effective world-building. I disagree that Katniss doesn’t change, but she is an unreliable narrator, and as such, doesn’t always admit to us her changes. I can see people saying that it is just a page-turner and I did find a couple of errors, but I think science fiction is realistically a very hard genre to write in, and she has succeeded beautifully. Maybe I just loved it, and I haven’t read much this year, but I think it deserves discussion, and I think dismissing it as “just a good page-turner” is a disservice to both the book and the award.

  8. Nina Lindsay says

    December 9, 2008 at 5:39 pm

    Amy, not blog stupid, it was buried in the October archives, titled *Matters of Apples and Oranges*, here http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/blog/560000656/post/1790035779.html. I will insert a link in Sharon’s post above. Thanks!

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

  • Other Mock Newbery Sites

    • Anderson’s Bookshops
    • For Those About to Mock
    • Good Reads Mock Newbery
    • Northport-East Northport PL
    • Rhode Island OLIS
  • Resources

    • Jen J's Starred Reviews Spreadsheet
    • Newbery Manual
    • Newbery Medal & Honor Books
    • Newbery Terms & Criteria
  • Follow This Blog

    Enter your email address below to receive notifications of new blog posts by email.

    This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

    This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

    Primary Sidebar

    • News & Features
    • Reviews+
    • Technology
    • School Libraries
    • Public Libraries
    • Age Level
    • Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Classroom
    • Diversity
    • People
    • Job Zone

    Reviews+

    • Book Lists
    • Best Books
    • Media
    • Reference
    • Series Made Simple
    • Tech
    • Review for SLJ
    • Review Submissions

    SLJ Blog Network

    • 100 Scope Notes
    • A Fuse #8 Production
    • Good Comics for Kids
    • Heavy Medal
    • Neverending Search
    • Teen Librarian Toolbox
    • The Classroom Bookshelf
    • The Yarn

    Resources

    • 2022 Youth Media Awards
    • The Newbery at 100: SLJ Celebrates the 100th Anniversary of the Award
    • Special Report | School Libraries 2021
    • Summer Reading 2021
    • Series Made Simple Spring 2021
    • SLJ Diverse Books Survey
    • Summer Programming Survey
    • Research
    • White Papers / Case Studies
    • School Librarian of the Year
    • Mathical Book Prize Collection Development Awards
    • Librarian/Teacher Collaboration Award

    Events & PD

    • In-Person Events
    • Online Courses
    • Virtual Events
    • Webcasts
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Media Inquiries
    • Newsletter Sign Up
    • Content Submissions
    • Data Privacy
    • Terms of Use
    • Terms of Sale
    • FAQs
    • Diversity Policy
    • Careers at MSI


    COPYRIGHT © 2022


    COPYRIGHT © 2022