SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
SLJ Blog Network +
  • 100 Scope Notes
  • A Fuse #8 Production
  • Good Comics for Kids
  • Heavy Medal: A Mock Newbery Blog
  • Teen Librarian Toolbox
  • The Classroom Bookshelf
  • The Yarn
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About/Contact
  • Book Discussion
  • Heavy Medal Mock
  • Process

September 27, 2010 by Nina Lindsay

Mocking

September 27, 2010 by Nina Lindsay   4 comments

We’ve tentatively decided on Sunday, December 12 for our live Mock Newbery discussion in Oakland CA…with a reading list ETA at Halloween.

A quick refresher on the Newbery process:

  1. A brand new committee forms each year, charged with considering eligible books from that year only…not to be compared to other books by the same author, or on the same subject (unless, of course, such are also eligibile books that year)…not to be limited by any categories, but only by the definitions of the award. 
  2. Committee members receive books from publishers throughout the year, but also search them out on their own. All eligibile books are to be considered.  “Submitting” them is a convenience only.  Committee members email “suggestions” to the chair monthly, and the chair compiles an anonymous list of “suggested” titles, with a tally of how many committee members have suggested them. This list keeps the committee in tune, without any judgment about who’s suggested what. It’s a way to alert members to titles they may not have noticed, and to see if other committee members think a book is a strong as you do.
  3. The committee meets at the ALA Annual Conference in the summer for practice discussion and logisitics, but no “real” discussion happens until the ALA Midwinter Meeting in January. In advance of that meeting, committee members send in seven signed, annotated nominations, spread out through the late fall (the chair sets the calendar) for titles they feel strongly about.  These nominated titles generally constitute the discussion list for Midwinter, though technically any eligibile title can be discussed (a review of the manual explains this better). All suggestions and nominations are confidential. There is no posted short-list.
  4. For about 3 days straight, the committee lock themselves into a room (with plenty of snacks) and discuss every title they need to in order to progress to a vote.  Anonymous ballots rank each members 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choices.  Each 1st place vote gets a title 4 points; each 2nd place vote 3 points; each 3rd place vote 2 points.  If a title has at least 8 1st place votes (is the first choice of a majority) and an 8 point spread above the next title in total points, it has won the Newbery.  If no title has a winning vote, the committee re-discusses and re-ballots until there is a winner.  Hung-over with exhaustion, they then draft a press-release, nap fitfully, show up at 5:30amish on Monday morning to call the winners and show up at the press conference where we all find out the winners to the many fabulous ALA Youth Media Awards! (Then have a group photo taken. Then collapse.)

In our Oakland Mock Newbery, we attempt to model the committee process. Steps 1-3 happen between now and December 12, and Step 4 happens on that afternoon, over the course of 4 hours.   Jonathan and I will select a shortlist of 8-9 titles that we will post here.  Having both served on the committee, we try to choose titles that we feel like we might support if we were committee members this year…but also a range of titles that we think will provoke interesting discussions, and that give you all a sense of the variety of literature that’s eligible for the award.  The Newbery is not an award for fiction, or for any age range more specific that “zero to fourteen.” 

Usually we hold our discussion the weekend before the Midwinter Meeting…but that Meeting is much earlier than it usually is this year. That means we have to move up ahead of the holidays…and that means that there may be some favorite contenders with late pub dates that we don’t include just because it’s going to be too hard for participants to get their hands on them in time.  Also…some sleepers that we’ll likely miss.

SCROLL TO KEEP READING THIS POST

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

I toyed this summer with a format for an online version of what we do at our live discussion. But…you, know, I just could not come up with something that interested and satisfied me.  To ensure that all voting participants have read every book, and participate in the discussion, gets too prescriptive in an online model.  It’s less a vote than a process of consensus.  Trying to figure out how to do this online simply exhausted me.  One could certainly have a more open online forum and vote…but that no longer holds my interest.  I realized I like doing the kind of in-person discussion that first attracted me at the Cooperative Children’s Book Center, and that though technology and 2.0 has enhanced that process (as it has enhanced the actual committee process I believe), the integrity of the award rests in large part  on the carefully developed in-person deliberation process that has continued to evolve.  That’s the part of the Newbery that I’m most interested in “mocking.”

There are a variety of ways to Mock Newbery, and you should check them out:

Allen County

Eva Perry

Goodreads

Rhode Island

Newbery Visionaries

Update 10/12:

St Joseph County Public Library… for Children

St Joseph County Public Library…for Adults

(and what else have I forgotten? Let me know and I can add it….)

Filed under: Uncategorized

SHARE:

Read or Leave Comments

About Nina Lindsay

Nina Lindsay is the Children's Services Coordinator at the Oakland Public Library, CA. She chaired the 2008 Newbery Committee, and served on the 2004 and 1998 committees. You can reach her at ninalindsay@gmail.com

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

January 2023

FREEWATER wins the Newbery Medal, live reactions from Heavy Medal bloggers

by Nina Lindsay

January 2023

Heavy Medal Mock Newbery Webcast Results

by Nina Lindsay

December 2022

Calling all Mock Newbery Enthusiasts: Join the 2023 Heavy Medal Award Committee

by Nina Lindsay

October 2022

Two More Titles: November Nomination Time

by Nina Lindsay

September 2022

85 Books to Consider: Mock Newbery Suggestions Updated

by Nina Lindsay

ADVERTISEMENT

SLJ Blog Network

100 Scope Notes

2023 Caldecott Jump

by Travis Jonker

A Fuse #8 Production

Fuse 8 n’ Kate: A Bad Case of Stripes by David Shannon

by Betsy Bird

Good Comics for Kids

Ben Mortara and the Thieves of the Golden Table | This Week’s Comics

by Lori Henderson

Heavy Medal

March suggestions: early Mock Newbery possibilities

by Emily Mroczek-Bayci

Teen Librarian Toolbox

New Reports Show a Decline in YA Book Sales and I Have Some Thoughts as to Why That Might be Happening

by Karen Jensen, MLS

The Classroom Bookshelf

The Classroom Bookshelf is Moving

by Erika Thulin Dawes

The Yarn

Newbery Medalist Amina Luqman-Dawson visits The Yarn

by Colby Sharp

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Articles on SLJ

Ringing in the Newbery (and Caldecott): An awards-trivia smackdown with Betsy Bird and Travis Jonker

2021 Youth Media Awards Winners

Children’s Publishing World Reacts to Michaela Goade's History-Making Caldecott Medal, Rest of the YMA Winners

Linda Sue Park: Children Love Books with "Fierce Adoration" | The Newbery at 100

Susan Cooper on her Wartime Childhood and How Writing Is "Fed by My Unconscious" | The Newbery at 100

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jonathan Hunt says

    September 28, 2010 at 2:28 am

    One of the most difficult things about having it so early is leaving off the late publications. There are a number of excellent nonfiction titles with late publication dates, namely THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE BARBIE by Tanya Lee Stone, BUILT TO LAST by David Macaulay (which may have eligibility and illustration vs. text issues), SUGAR CHANGED THE WORLD by Marc Aronson and Marina Budhos, and THE CROSSING by Jim Murphy. And on the fiction side of things, we would be hard pressed to include FORGE by Laurie Halse Anderson and A TALE DARK AND GRIMM by Adam Gidwitz, a debut novel with lots of buzz.

  2. smt says

    September 29, 2010 at 9:46 pm

    Granted those books are published late but wouldn’t the publishers have the committee ARCs a long time ago?

    • Nina Lindsay says

      September 29, 2010 at 10:31 pm

      Sure, publishers sent ARCs out a while ago, and that’s how I got them…but not all of the people who participate in the Mock Newbery have ready access to ARCs. We’re all local, but a wide local…and while I make copies available to share, it’s hard. Usually if we have ONE title on the list that’s hard to get a hold of, people manage to borrow or buy it. But since we require that to vote, you must have read all the titles, it’s counterproductive to make it too hard to have read everything.

      Of course, if you’re on the committee, too bad: you do what you have to to read what you need to! Publishers send a lot, but not everything…and I’ve always ending up buying a few things my committee year. There’s something that a publisher doesn’t send cause THEY don’t think it’s a contender…but someone tells you about it, or you read an intriguing review, and it’s late in the year and you don’t have time to wait….

  3. Kris says

    October 12, 2010 at 10:46 pm

    The St. Joseph County Public Library does a children’s and adult’s Mock Newbery Club now. Here are our 2 websites:

    http://www.libraryforlife.org/kids/mocknewbery

    http://sjcplmocknewbery11.blogspot.com/

    Thanks for your blog! It’s entertaining and helps us prepare for our club.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

  • Other Mock Newbery Sites

    • Anderson’s Bookshops
    • For Those About to Mock
    • Good Reads Mock Newbery
    • Northport-East Northport PL
    • Rhode Island OLIS
  • Resources

    • Jen J's Starred Reviews Spreadsheet
    • Newbery Manual
    • Newbery Medal & Honor Books
    • Newbery Terms & Criteria
  • Follow This Blog

    Enter your email address below to receive notifications of new blog posts by email.

    This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

    This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

    Primary Sidebar

    • News & Features
    • Reviews+
    • Technology
    • School Libraries
    • Public Libraries
    • Age Level
    • Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Classroom
    • Diversity
    • People
    • Job Zone

    Reviews+

    • Book Lists
    • Best Books
    • Media
    • Reference
    • Series Made Simple
    • Tech
    • Review for SLJ
    • Review Submissions

    SLJ Blog Network

    • 100 Scope Notes
    • A Fuse #8 Production
    • Good Comics for Kids
    • Heavy Medal
    • Neverending Search
    • Teen Librarian Toolbox
    • The Classroom Bookshelf
    • The Yarn

    Resources

    • 2022 Youth Media Awards
    • The Newbery at 100: SLJ Celebrates the 100th Anniversary of the Award
    • Special Report | School Libraries 2021
    • Summer Reading 2021
    • Series Made Simple Spring 2021
    • SLJ Diverse Books Survey
    • Summer Programming Survey
    • Research
    • White Papers / Case Studies
    • School Librarian of the Year
    • Mathical Book Prize Collection Development Awards
    • Librarian/Teacher Collaboration Award

    Events & PD

    • In-Person Events
    • Online Courses
    • Virtual Events
    • Webcasts
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Media Inquiries
    • Newsletter Sign Up
    • Content Submissions
    • Data Privacy
    • Terms of Use
    • Terms of Sale
    • FAQs
    • Diversity Policy
    • Careers at MSI


    COPYRIGHT © 2023


    COPYRIGHT © 2023