SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
SLJ Blog Network +
  • 100 Scope Notes
  • A Fuse #8 Production
  • Good Comics for Kids
  • Heavy Medal: A Mock Newbery Blog
  • Teen Librarian Toolbox
  • The Classroom Bookshelf
  • The Yarn
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About/Contact
  • Book Discussion
  • Heavy Medal Mock
  • Process

January 16, 2017 by Sharon McKellar

Oakland Mock Newbery Results

January 16, 2017 by Sharon McKellar   18 comments

What a nice day I had discussing this batch of outstanding books with this gang of outstanding people!  Thanks to all who came out and thanks, especially, to those who helped to organize.  Look at this awesome crew!  I’m really sorry I jumped right in front of Melissa and blocked her face as my self-timer went off. Total party foul!

IMG_20170115_162041

So, we had something unprecedented happen this year.  We CLEARLY selected a winner and a single honor book with one ballot.  None of us could remember a time this had happened before.

SCROLL TO KEEP READING THIS POST

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Winner:
Wolf Hollow by Lauren Wolk

Honor Book:
Ghost by Jason Reynolds

img_20170115_161745 (2)

This is how the points panned out:

  • Juana & Lucas – 0
  • Full of Beans – 2
  • Pax – 2
  • Samurai Rising – 3
  • Some Writer – 5
  • When the Sea Turned to Silver – 7
  • When Green Becomes Tomatoes – 8
  • Ghost – 21
  • Wolf Hollow – 33

And here’s the spread:

img_20170115_160345 (1)

With such a clear first place winner and a large amount of secondary support for our honor book, we agreed with a quick discussion that we didn’t find the rest of the books to be distinguished enough to merit honors.  None of our other books received any 1st place votes and the difference in point from Ghost to the next highest title, When Green Becomes Tomatoes, was a full 13 points.

We did have some extra time and talked a little bit about creation of the shortlist and the potential in future years to try less hard to have a diverse set of books in terms of genre and age range, instead focussing more in on age range or type of book to do a more apples to apples comparison.

Of course the real committee is comparing apples to apples to oranges to oranges to strawberries, and we have to figure out how to narrow in in a way that leads to fulfilling fruitful discussion that also gives a fun sense of how the actual committee works. Things to ponder over the next year!

Only one week until we get to see the real winner and honors!  And lucky us, we had a real committee member in our discussion today, so we feel a little bit special, like our voices might have been louder than usual.

 

Filed under: Book Discussion, Uncategorized

SHARE:

Read or Leave Comments

About Sharon McKellar

Sharon McKellar is the Supervising Librarian for Teen Services at the Oakland Public Library in California. She has served on the Rainbow List Committee, the Notable Children’s Recordings Committee, The Arbuthnot Honor Lecture Committee, and the 2015 Caldecott Committee. You can reach her at sharon@mckellar.org.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

November 2019

Music, Race, and the American Dream: Female voices will not be silenced.

by Sharon McKellar

November 2019

Last, Last Day of Summer by Lamar Giles.

by Sharon McKellar

October 2019

Pet by akwaeke emezi

by Sharon McKellar

October 2019

Lalani of the Distant Sea by Erin Entrada Kelly

by Sharon McKellar

October 2019

Graphic Novels are here to stay.

by Sharon McKellar

ADVERTISEMENT

SLJ Blog Network

100 Scope Notes

Your 2023 Caldecott Comment Card

by Travis Jonker

A Fuse #8 Production

Fuse 8 n’ Kate: Will Spring Be Early? Or Will Spring Be Late? by Crockett Johnson

by Betsy Bird

Good Comics for Kids

Evil Secret Society of Cats | This Week’s Comics

by Lori Henderson

Heavy Medal

Heavy Medal Mock Newbery Readers’ Poll Results

by Steven Engelfried

Teen Librarian Toolbox

Philosophy and/as/of Literature, a guest post by Amy Zhang

by Amanda MacGregor

The Classroom Bookshelf

The Classroom Bookshelf is Moving

by Erika Thulin Dawes

The Yarn

A Book 25 Years in the Making: Marla Frazee Visits The Yarn

by Travis Jonker

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Articles on SLJ

Ringing in the Newbery (and Caldecott): An awards-trivia smackdown with Betsy Bird and Travis Jonker

2021 Youth Media Awards Winners

Children’s Publishing World Reacts to Michaela Goade's History-Making Caldecott Medal, Rest of the YMA Winners

A Grateful Michaela Goade Makes Caldecott History

A Long Time Coming: Angeline Boulley's 'Firekeeper's Daughter' Takes 2022 Printz Award

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jonathan Hunt says

    January 16, 2017 at 9:45 am

    Well done, Oakland! Nice picks!

    Perhaps we should have stuck with our original apples-to-apples shortlist? 😛

    https://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2016/09/06/ten-picture-books-that-can-win-the-2017-newbery-medal/

  2. Amanda says

    January 17, 2017 at 12:53 pm

    I’m sorry to have missed it this year, but what an interestingly decisive result! Great work, everyone.

  3. Meredith Burton says

    January 17, 2017 at 1:23 pm

    Very intriguing that the vote was so decisive! Wolf Hollow is one I haven’t been able to forget, (and I listened to it early in the year). I do like more hopeful stories, but I think Wolf Hollow has so much to say about the unfairness in life. Also, the novel thankfully illuminates the truth that kindness, (despite whether it’s accepted or not), is the ultimate gift. I must read Ghost because it sounds like it will be a strong contender.

    I don’t envy the committee their job as it sounds like it would be very challenging. Lots of great titles this year.

    • Joe says

      January 17, 2017 at 3:17 pm

      Meredith, you hit on something that I have failed to articulate when I talk about this book with both the children and adults in my school. When asked what I personally like about the book, I often respond that I enjoy the moral ambiguity. Children in particular see the world around them as morally ambiguous, and this book very much addresses that. It’s your parenthetical aside that really gets to what I can never articulate – this book is about kindness, both in how it can succeed for us and how it can fail for us, regardless of how hard we try.

      The children in my Mock Newbery club talk a lot about the characterization in Wolf Hollow and the relationship between the characters, particularly Tobias and Annabelle. They are particularly intrigued though, with how evil Betty is and how she only escapes her evilness by death – and continues to lie as she’s dying. They’re fascinated by that. I think, too, that your comment addresses that. So many people are kind to Betty, and it doesn’t seem to matter.

      The Real Committee this year has a monumental task ahead of them. Like you, I don’t envy them a bit.

    • Eric Carpenter says

      January 17, 2017 at 6:38 pm

      Ah, but what a book has to say should be irrelevant to the newbery discussion. The committee should only be concerned with how it is said.

      • Joe says

        January 17, 2017 at 9:15 pm

        It says so brilliantly, with evocative language, crisply rendered characters, and a clearly delineated theme. Better?

      • Mary says

        January 18, 2017 at 11:33 am

        Eric, you don’t really mean that, do you?

      • Eric Carpenter says

        January 18, 2017 at 12:39 pm

        Mary, Yes that is how I read the criteria. Any discussion of these titles must be within the parameters of the criteria. I can’t find anywhere in the criteria where the committee is asked to weigh the story, ideas, or the themes of a title. Likewise they aren’t judging how likable or not they find the characters.
        The criteria are clearly written to focus the committee members on the literary elements of a text.

      • Mr. H says

        January 18, 2017 at 1:18 pm

        Isn’t that “interpretation of the theme or concept?”

      • Eric Carpenter says

        January 18, 2017 at 1:38 pm

        The committee can certainly discuss how well a theme or concept is interpreted within the text. (ie. is it delivered pedantically or subtly, is it well integrated into the narrative or does the author hit the reader over the head, etc). But the committee can’t discuss the worthiness of the theme or concepts or can it discuss whether they like the theme or how the theme/concepts made them feel.
        Only the excellence of the INTERPRETATION, not theme or concept themselves should be evaluated by the committee members.

      • Mr. H says

        January 18, 2017 at 1:42 pm

        I gotcha! In fact, as soon as I hit “post”, I think it dawned on me what you had meant. In fact, I just referenced it in another post I made simultaneously!

  4. Joe says

    January 18, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    Not sure where else to post it, but I’ll do so here. My Mock Newbery students (40 counted at roll call, so take that for what it’s worth) cast their final ballots today.

    Landslide medal (15 first place votes, 1 second place votes, 8 third place votes) to WOLF HOLLOW.

    Three honors were bestowed, though the book that had the next highest score was 33 points behind medal winner): PAX; NINE, TEN; INQUISITOR’S TALE.

    They are rabid for Monday morning. Absolutely rabid.

    • Mr. H says

      January 18, 2017 at 5:11 pm

      Awesome! I remember the year TURTLE IN PARADISE won an Honor because my class and I had read a number of the books that year and TURTLE was our favorite. I let them watch the event, or at least, we had it on in the background… The moment the cover flashed across the screen, pandemonium!

  5. Destinee says

    January 18, 2017 at 5:02 pm

    I visited two different schools for Mock Newbery this week. One 5th grade class despised WOLF HOLLOW and loved INQUISITOR’S TALE. The other 5th grade class (at a different school) was the exact opposite. It was almost freaky how these kids, who have never met, were countering each other’s arguments. It seemed to come down to how they felt about tonal issues. WH was deemed too dark and depressing by its detractors; IT too strange and inconsistent.

    Our other books were MS. BIXBY’S LAST DAY and WILD ROBOT, but they each only had a few supporters.

  6. Safranit Molly says

    January 18, 2017 at 7:01 pm

    The results of our Mock Newbery at Portland Jewish Academy:

    Wolf Hollow by Lauren Wolk
    Ghost by Jason Reynolds
    We Will Not Be Silent by Russell Freedman

    It took two rounds of balloting because we had a great variety in favorites this year. Several kids were sad to see their favorites not on the final ballot–just like I am sure real committee members feel when their beloved book doesn’t make the cut.

    • Rosanne Parry says

      January 18, 2017 at 8:49 pm

      Molly, I love it that your students chose We Will Not Be Silent. I liked that title very much, particularly since I lived in Bavaria in the 90s. My beloved neighbors Irmagart and Hugo were the same age that Hans and Sophie Scholl would be had they lived. They had interesting things to say about being a teenager in WWII Germany and I’m glad this book is gaining an audience at this point in our history.

  7. DaNae says

    January 20, 2017 at 5:17 pm

    Here at Snow Horse I just put my 25 ballots into the tabulator.

    With a runaway 59 points, GHOST is our Medalist.
    Honors:
    Raymie 20 pts
    Wild Robot 15 pts.

    Around forty different books were read with a requirement that at least five must be read to vote. 21 different titles showed up on the ballots but GHOST received 11 first place votes. Fairly conclusive. They really loved his voice.

  8. Safranit Molly says

    January 21, 2017 at 10:04 am

    Yes, I believe We Will Not Be Silent had a special resonance for my community this year in light of the political parallels my students have very clearly observed. Let us hope that our young people will not be silent as we move forward into the future. I thank Russell Freedman for giving us such a timely reminder of the difference that young resistance can make.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

  • Other Mock Newbery Sites

    • Anderson’s Bookshops
    • For Those About to Mock
    • Good Reads Mock Newbery
    • Northport-East Northport PL
    • Rhode Island OLIS
  • Resources

    • Jen J's Starred Reviews Spreadsheet
    • Newbery Manual
    • Newbery Medal & Honor Books
    • Newbery Terms & Criteria
  • Follow This Blog

    Enter your email address below to receive notifications of new blog posts by email.

    This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

    This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

    Primary Sidebar

    • News & Features
    • Reviews+
    • Technology
    • School Libraries
    • Public Libraries
    • Age Level
    • Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Classroom
    • Diversity
    • People
    • Job Zone

    Reviews+

    • Book Lists
    • Best Books
    • Media
    • Reference
    • Series Made Simple
    • Tech
    • Review for SLJ
    • Review Submissions

    SLJ Blog Network

    • 100 Scope Notes
    • A Fuse #8 Production
    • Good Comics for Kids
    • Heavy Medal
    • Neverending Search
    • Teen Librarian Toolbox
    • The Classroom Bookshelf
    • The Yarn

    Resources

    • 2022 Youth Media Awards
    • The Newbery at 100: SLJ Celebrates the 100th Anniversary of the Award
    • Special Report | School Libraries 2021
    • Summer Reading 2021
    • Series Made Simple Spring 2021
    • SLJ Diverse Books Survey
    • Summer Programming Survey
    • Research
    • White Papers / Case Studies
    • School Librarian of the Year
    • Mathical Book Prize Collection Development Awards
    • Librarian/Teacher Collaboration Award

    Events & PD

    • In-Person Events
    • Online Courses
    • Virtual Events
    • Webcasts
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Media Inquiries
    • Newsletter Sign Up
    • Content Submissions
    • Data Privacy
    • Terms of Use
    • Terms of Sale
    • FAQs
    • Diversity Policy
    • Careers at MSI


    COPYRIGHT © 2023


    COPYRIGHT © 2023