You Can’t Read Them All: Widening the net of the Newbery search
As the year nears its end, mock-Newbery groups like this one focus more than ever on what we surmise are the most likely contenders for the Medal. We’re currently in the last part of the “nomination” process, where participants select their seven top titles. Earlier, we solicited monthly “suggestions” to build a wide list of books to consider from the first eight months of the year.. Our nomination and suggestion practices are modeled on, but not identical to the work of the real Committee.
But real Committee members have to read far more widely than those lists in order to fully explore the full range of Newbery possibilities. If members aren’t sure what books to read at the start of the year, they can turn to the Newbery Manual for this advice:
Begin immediately to read and evaluate eligible booksp 25
Actually, that’s really not so helpful, is it? Or maybe it is, because it gives the Committee a great deal of flexibility around how to cover as many potential candidates as possible, without applying restrictive rules. A single person cannot read all of the eligible books, of course, so the hope is that when fifteen people are reading voraciously and widely for a full year, the combined total of the titles they read (or at least partially read) will be enough to ensure that no hidden gem was left undiscovered. As chair, it’s possible that I used the phrase “trust the process” at an annoying level of repetition.
During my Committee years, the nominations and suggestions were the only lists shared Committee-wide, and I’m pretty sure that’s typical. I did feel like we covered what we needed to beyond that list, though. One helpful activity that some Committees apply at the beginning of the year is to share reading strengths and weaknesses around the group. Members think about their own reading tests, then list the genres and styles that they typically seek out, along with the ones that they are more likely to avoid.
All members will still have to read far beyond their usual fare, especially as the suggestions come in, but it can be very reassuring to learn that there are several people who love nonfiction, even if not everyone does, or that a few people will be especially alert to early readers and short chapter books. You might dig a little deeper into the genres that are your strengths, then have faith that other members are doing the same in the areas that you spend less time on.
With that in mind, I’m thinking about the areas I’ve been especially slack on this year:
I’ve been especially lax on keeping up with the young-mid YA books. The ones that are eligible for the award, but skirt the upper edges of the Newbery’s 0-14 age range. In a good year I’ll look at a Mock Printz list or two and will have read about half of the titles. Not so much this year. I’m afraid the only steps I made in this area was to read two of my favorite authors: Rita Williams-Garcia’s A SITTING IN ST. JAMES was excellent, but I’m doubtful that it would fare well in a Mock-Newbery. SWITCH by A. S. King was interesting, but I fear I didn’t understand it well enough to discuss it (she’s a risk-taking writer for sure).
These can be really challenging in a Newbery year. I know, they’re short, but there are just so many of them. And despite their brevity, it takes a different way of thinking to evaluate picture book texts in Newbery terms. I did read several good picture books this year because a co-worker is serving on the Caldecott Committee and brought in many. That led me to WATERCRESS, which could have a shot, and also MEL FELL by Corey Tabor, which probably isn’t Newbery fodder, but it’s my Caldecott favorite. I still feel like there could easily be dozens of excellent picture book texts that I’ve missed, though.
Books Like SMILE
I used to seek out graphic novels about middle school kids because Raina Telgemeier is so popular and I needed more books like hers to recommend to readers. Now there are a ton of those coming out, though, and I’m a little burned out. Now I fall back more on authors I know best within that field, like Shannon Hale’s FRIENDS FOREVER, or graphic novels with more unusual style or content, like THE LEGEND OF AUNTIE PO by Shing Yin Khor.
First Chapter Books
I felt okay about this category because I read at least three excellent books that fit: HARRY VS. THE FIRST 100 DAYS, MAYBE, MAYBE MARISOL RAINEY, and BILLY MILLER MAKES A WISH. But looking at SLJ’s Best Chapter Books of 2021 list reminds me that I didn’t do a good job of seeking out books by new authors in this area, and probably still should.
Picture Book Biographies
It seems like there have been dozens of these published in the past few years, and many of them get excellent reviews. Among the ones I have read, RUNAWAY is especially impressive, but there are a bunch of others I’ve read about, but haven’t yet looked at myself.
I’m not sure that I’ll be able to do much to address these holes in my reading for this year. I’ll have my hands full catching up on Heavy Medal nominations. But it’s still useful to acknowledge our reading strengths and weaknesses, and I’d love to hear where other Heavy Medals fall short…
Filed under: Book Discussion
About Steven Engelfried
Steven Engelfried was the Library Services Manager at the Wilsonville Public Library in Oregon until he retired after 35 years as a full-time librarian. He served on the 2010 Newbery committee, chaired the 2013 Newbery Committee, and also served on the 2002 Caldecott committee. You can reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
SLJ Blog Network